Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Subject: How many slaves do you own?

As you will recall, Henry Louis Gates, Jr. is the Harvard professor who got arrested by Cambridge Police a year or two ago. Fred Reed was a police reporter for one of the large Washington newspapers. He now writes a column which can be googled ~ “Fred on Everything.”
Fred published a weekly online column in which he got to say the things his editors would never, ever have let him write in the paper. His stuff is iconoclastic and various articles have probably offended everyone..regardless of political orientation. So, with the warning that “This is definitely not politically correct,” here comes Fred…..

The following is an essay regarding the failings of a system and a culture. Please note that he elegantly describes the mood of many Americans and he does so without prejudice.

Slavery Reparations ……….by Fred Reed!

“On the Web I find that Henry Louis Gates Jr., the chairman of Afro-American Studies at Harvard, is demanding that whites pay reparations to blacks. It’s because of slavery, see. He is joined in this endeavor by a gaggle of other professional blacks. I guess he’ll send me a bill, huh?

I feel like saying, “Let me get this straight, Hank. I’m slow. Be patient.

You want free money because of slavery, right?  I don’t blame you.” I’d like free money too.  Tell you what. I believe in justice.  I’ll give you a million dollars for every slave I own, and another million for every year you were a slave.  Fair enough?  But tell me, how many slaves do you suppose I have?  In round numbers, I mean…say to the nearest dozen. And how long were you a slave?

Oh. In other words, I owe you reparations for something that I didn’t do and didn’t happen to you. That makes sense. Like lug nuts on a birthday cake.

Personally, I think you owe me reparations for things you didn’t do and never happened to me. I’ve never been coated in Dutch chocolate and thrown from the Eiffel Tower. I’ll bet you’ve never done it to anyone. I want reparations. Kind of silly, isn’t it?

But if we’re going to talk about reparations, that’s a street that runs in two directions. You want money from me for what some other whites did to some other blacks in another century?

How about you guys paying whites reparations for current expenses caused by blacks? Not long ago blacks burned down half of Los Angeles, a city in my country. Cities are expensive, Hank. Build one sometime and you’ll see what I mean. Whites had to pay taxes to repair Los Angeles for you. You can send me a check.

Now, yes, I know you burned LA because you didn’t like the verdict in the trial of those police officers. Well, I didn’t like the verdict in the Simpson trial. But I didn’t burn my house and loot Korean grocers, or burn down a city.

Over the years blacks have burned a lot of American cities: Newark, Detroit, Watts, on and on. Now add in the fantastic cost over the years of welfare in all its forms, the cost of all of those police calls people had to make, for cells and jails and security systems in department stores.

I can’t live in the capital city of my own country because of crime committed by blacks. Toss in the cultural cost of lowering standards in everything for the benefit of blacks. See what I mean?

Now, I’d view things differently if you said to me, “Fred, blacks can’t get anywhere in a modern country without education. We know that. We need better schools, smarter teachers, harder courses, books with smaller pictures and bigger words. Can you help us?”

I’d say, “Hallelujah! Hoo-ahh! Not just yes, but hell yes. Let’s sell an aircraft carrier and get these folks some real schools and get them into the economic main-stream.’ I’d say It partly because it would be the right thing to do, and partly because I’d like to add you guys to the tax base.

The current custodial state is expensive. I’d just love for blacks to study and learn to compete and stop burning places. But is it going to happen? You may not believe it, but I, and most whites, don’t like seeing blacks as miserable and screwed up as they are.

I spend a fair amount of time in the projects. Those places are ugly. It’s no fun watching perfectly good kids turn into semi-literate dope dealers who barely speak English. It just plain ain’t right. But, Hank, what am I supposed to do about it? I can’t do your children’s homework. At some point, people have to do things for themselves, or they don’t get done. Maybe it’s time.

I’ll tell you what I see out in the world, Hank… I think blacks are too accustomed to getting anything they want by just demanding it. True, it has worked for over half a century. Get a few hundred people in the street, implicitly threaten to loot and burn, holler about slavery, and sadly the Great White Cash Spigot turns on.

Thing is, whites don’t much buy it any longer. Most recognize that what once was a civil-rights movement has become a shakedown game. Few people still feel responsible for the failings and inadequacies of blacks. Political correctness keeps the lid on — but everyone knows the score. Which scares me, Hank.

On one hand, blacks hate whites and incline toward looting and burning. (The whites you hate are the ones who marched in the civil-rights movement. Ever think about that?)

On the other hand, whites quietly grow wearier and wearier of it. Not good, Hank.

On the third hand (allow me three hands, for rhetorical convenience), blacks keep demanding things. As I write, you demand reparations for slavery. Blacks in Oklahoma (I think it was) want money for some ancient race riot.

Other blacks reject the Declaration of Independence. Blacks in New York hint broadly at burning and looting over a trial, yet more demand the elimination of the Confederate flag, and the federal equal opportunity apparatus, which means blacks want to sue Silicon Valley for not hiring nonexistent black engineers. That’s a lot of demanding for one month,Hank.

What happens if whites ever say, “No”?

Now, how about you? You’ve got a cushy job up there at Harvard, and you can hoot and holler about what swine and bandits whites are. I guess it’s lots of fun, and you get a salary for it to boot. But don’t you think you might do blacks more good if you told them to complain less and study more?

For example, if you want blacks to work in Silicon Gulch, the best approach might be to find some really smart black guys, and get them to study digital design ~ not Black Studies (as you teach). That’s how everybody else does it. It works. Then blacks wouldn’t feel left out, and racial tensions would decline. Sound like a plan?

Just out of curiosity, how many hours a week do professors of Afro-American Studies spend in the projects, encouraging poor black kids to study real-life sho-nuf subjects?” ~~~

Pass this one across America!!!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

“Those who beat swords into plowhares usually end up plowing for those who don’t.” Ben Franklin.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ “The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing!” Albert Einstein.

Pledge of Allegiance -

Never a doubt where “I” stand…..* *Subject: *Fwd: CBS Poll Results As many of you are aware, it was the Knights of Columbus who submitted to congress that the words “Under God” should be added to our pledge of allegiance. Both Houses of Congress passed the law and it was signed by President Eisenhower in 1954. The information below was based on a poll taken by NBC on what percentage think we should keep the words in our pledge verses the percent who want it removed. I*f you read this and agree that “under God” should be left in the pledge, then just forward it to others and you have voted for it to be left in. If you delete it and don’t forward it you are voting NO to “under God.” Easy huh!* *Official versions(changes in bold red italics)* *1892* “I pledge allegiance to my flag and the republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” *1892 to 1923* “I pledge allegiance to my flag and *to*the republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” *1923 to 1924* “I pledge allegiance to *the*flag *of the United States* and to the republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” *1924 to 1954* “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States *of America**,* and to the republic for which it stands; one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” *1954 to Present* “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America , and to the republic for which it stands, one nation *under God**,* indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” *Shock to NBC* *This is not sent for discussion. If you agree, forward it… If you don’t, delete it. I don’t want to know one way or the other. By m**y* *forwarding it, you know how I feel.* *Do you believe that the word “God” should stay in American culture?* *NBC this morning had a poll on this question. They had the highest Number of responses that they have ever had for one of their polls, and the Percentage was the same as this:* *86% to keep the words, “IN God We Trust” and “God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, **14% against.* *That is a pretty ‘commanding’ public response.* *I was asked to send this on if I agreed* *or **delete if I didn’t.* *Now it is your turn. It is said that 86% of Americans believe the word “God” should stay. Therefore, I have a very hard time understanding why there is such a mess about having “In God We Trust” on our money and having “God” in the Pledge of Allegiance.* *Why is the world catering to this 14%?* *AMEN!* *If you agree, pass this on … **if not, simply delete.* *In God We Trust* *And again I say AMEN!*

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/13/source-obama-to-announce-10-point-immigration-plan-via-exec-action-as-early-as/

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/four-myths-about-slavery-in-the-us/

Don’t forget that tomorrow is the day. Derrick Wilburn will be that guest speaker of the Tea Party at Cheesy Lee’s, 600 W. Elkhorn Ave., Estes Park. 1pm is the time to be there and support Liberty.

http://blackandconservative.com/

Dynamic speaker Derrick Wilburn talks about “Truth Transcending Color” in Estes Park, Saturday, October 25

Derrick Wilburn first made political waves when he started American Conservatives of Color. He has since become a tidal wave, rolling through the country in media and motivational speaking engagements. Now he comes to Estes Park to talk about Ethnic Minority Outreach in his “Truth Transcends Color” address. Not just a speech, Derrick will inspire and rally his audience.

This powerful free event takes place on Saturday, October 25th at 1:00 p.m. at Cheesy Lees Restaurant in the historic Elkhorn Lodge (west Elkhorn Avenue). Get there early, order a pizza, kick back and be inspired as Derrick talks about why he’s a black conservative, something some say is mutually exclusive.

Derrick is fresh off a rally in Florida with Colonel Allen West. He will talk about his mission to bridge the gap between conservative political issues and ethnic minorities in the USA. Yes, he’s black, and yes, he’s conservative. He discusses why the current administration has not helped minority communities, and if there is a better way.

A fresh face in the world of politics, Derrick is the founder, President and Chairman of the Board of the Rocky Mountain Black Conservatives, American Conservatives of Color, and BlackandConservative.com. Derrick Wilburn is also a renowned author and columnist, read nationally in American Thinker, Freedom’s Journal and the Tea Party News Network. His online videos may be viewed on the ACofC youtube channel and he frequently delivers the Tea Party National Weekly Address. He has three books in print, and has served as a faculty adjunct in the undergraduate school of business at the University of Phoenix’s San Jose, California campus.
Everyone is welcome to join the meeting, sponsored by Estes Park Tea Party Patriots. For more information, please call 586-5303.

Judicial Watch: Obama to Admit Non-Citizens for Ebola Treatment
Friday, October 17, 2014 04:00 PM

The government watchdog group Judicial Watch alleged Friday the Obama administration is formulating plans to admit Ebola-infected non-U.S. citizens into the United States for treatment.

The group, which cited one unidentified source, said the administration would aim to bring Ebola patients into the United States for treatment within the first days of diagnosis, and that it’s not clear who’d pay either for the transportation or treatment.

The group alleged the plan for treatment includes special waivers of laws and regulations that ban the admission of non-citizens with a communicable disease; Judicial Watch cited its source saying the administration has not told Congress about the plan.

“The source is concerned that the proposal is illegal; endangers the public health and welfare; and should require the approval of Congress,” Judicial Watch stated.

President Barack Obama has made it clear he opposes any travel bans to stop Ebola spreading from West Africa into the United States, noting Thursday “history shows that there is a likelihood of increased avoidance (that could lead to) more cases rather than less,” Fox News reports.

“The problem is that — in all the discussions that I’ve had thus far with experts in the field, experts in infectious disease … a travel ban is less effective than the measures that we are currently instituting,” Obama said.

The United States has brought American citizens back for treatment of Ebola — including Dr. Kent Brantly and a colleague who were working in Africa with Ebola patients, both recovered, and a freelance photojournalist who is currently undergoing treatment. No non-U.S. citizens, though, have been brought here for treatment.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 244 other followers